'More than Profits'에 해당되는 글 2건 |
||
[Built to Last] 비전기업의 탐색 :: 2007/04/20 00:013년 전 수강했던 Mini-MBA 과정 중 가장 인상 깊었던 PGEC (Principles of great enduring companies) 과정의 5주차 숙제...
다음으로 비전기업의 한 예로 여러분이 몸 담고 있는 기업이나 관심이 있는 기업(Find The BTL Evidence 학습자료에 소개된 18개 기업을 포함하여 국내 기업도 가능: 가능한 한 관련자료를 얻기 쉬운 기업) 중 한 개의 기업을 선정하여 웹사이트를 방문하십시오. 그리고 그 곳에서 어떻게 그 기업이 비전기업인지에 대한 증거를 찾아내어 아래의 질문 순서에 따라 600자(2-3페이지)분량으로 작성하십시오. 다음의 질문 순서에 따라 답하시오.
P&G is a training company. It has been conducting on-the-job, formal classroom, and web based training for a long time based on the belief that its success is derived from its people. It has been paying much attention to attracting and recruiting the finest people in the world. P&G provides the various learning program like personal leadership, people and communication, project management and e-learning programs. P&G’s extensive supports for training its people means that it can encourage individuals to develop their competency through high-quality education. P&G’s pursuing the learning organization surely seems to focus on long-term success, not short-term profit. P&G has been clearly concentrated on building a “learning” organization rather than on acquiring the individual personality traits of visionary leadership. That is the outstanding example of clock building. As the principle put it, organization is the ultimate invention of the clock-building leadership. [2] 그 기업이 지속적으로 핵심 가치와 핵심목표에 부합하고 있다는 증거 한 가지를 들어 주십시오.
Yes, P&G has a clearly defined core ideology and do every effort to stick to it.
In Yes, this anecdote shows clearly how P&G adhere to its core ideology.
4-1. Preserve the Core P&G has long-standing practices of carefully screening potential new hires, hiring young people for entry-level jobs, rigorously molding them into P&G ways of thought and behavior, spitting out the misfits, and making middle and top slots available only to loyal P&Gers who grew up inside the company. Indoctrination processes are both formal and informal. P&G inducts new employee into the company with training and orientation sessions and expects them to read its official biography “Eyes on Tomorrow”, which describes the company as “an integral part of the nation’s history” with “A spiritual inheritance” and “unchanging character”. New hires immediately find nearly all of their time occupied by working or socializing with other members of “the family”. P&G has a long historical track record of paternalistic and progressive employee pay and benefit programs, which bind its people closely to the company. (profit-sharing plan for workers, employee stock ownership plan, sickness-disability-retirement-life-insurance plan) P&G has used these programs not only as a means of rewarding employees, but also as mechanisms to influence behavior, gain commitment, and ensuring tightness of fit. That means P&G translates its core ideologies into tangible mechanisms aligned to send a consistent set of reinforcing signals. And it also indoctrinates people and impose tight of fit, and create a sense of belonging to something special. That is the exact example of “Cult-like Culture”, one mechanism among “Preserve the Core” principles. You’ve proved the existence of indoctrination process and tight of fit mechanism, showing that you understand cult-like culture which is pivotal in preserving the core.
P&G has the competing brand management structure that P&G brands compete directly with other P&G brands, almost if they were from different countries. P&G already had the best people, the best products, the best marketing muscle. So why not pit the best of P&G against the best of P&G? If the marketplace doesn’t provide enough competition, why not create a system of internal competition that makes it virtually impossible for any brand to rest on its laurels? That means P&G create internal competition in order to keep itself vibrant. P&G has a definite discomfort mechanism in place to combat the disease of complacency that inevitably begins to infect all successful organizations. This is the good example of “Good enough never is”, one mechanism among “Stimulate Progress”. Yes, brand manager system is a perfect example of GENI translated in the form of “clock”. Instructor feedback: Yours was a perfect one. Assessment: E Trackback Address :: http://read-lead.com/blog/trackback/209
|
||
[Built to Last] 사우스웨스트 분석 :: 2007/04/17 00:013년 전 수강했던 Mini-MBA 과정 중 가장 인상 깊었던 PGEC (Principles of great enduring companies) 과정의 둘째주 숙제... 사우스웨스트의 사례를 읽고, 사우스웨스트가 전반적으로 그들의 핵심 이념을 고수했는지, 그 핵심을 보존하는 메커니즘을 이용했는지를 분석하십시오. ‘숭배지향 문화’와 ‘내부 승진 경영자’라는 두 가지 메커니즘에 대해서는 사례 연구에서 분명한 증거를 찾을 수 있을 것입니다. 하지만 '이윤 추구를 넘어서’ 메커니즘에 대한 증거는 사례 연구에서 명시적으로 설명되고 있지 않습니다. 따라서 첫번째 두 번째 메커니즘에 대해서는 각각 세 가지 사례를 들어 토론하고, 세 번째 메커니즘에 대해서는 이를 암시하는 예를 확인하여 간략하게 설명하십시오. 그리고 핵심 이념을 보존하는 기능을 하고는 있지만, 세 가지 메커니즘의 범주에 포함시키기 어려운 예들을 추가로 확인하여 설명하십시오. [1] ‘숭배지향기업문화’(Cult-like Culture) 메커니즘의 세 가지 예를 들고, 이 것들이 왜 ‘숭배지향기업문화’ 메커니즘에 해당하는지 설명하십시오.
Yes. SWA is adopting many selective hiring processes to secure a tight cultural fit that plays a pivotal role in developing and keeping a cult-like culture. You pointed and explained this point very well with right example.
Great. You’ve successfully illustrated indoctrination process of SWA training programs. Indoctrination is important criteria for a cult-like culture.
SW has long-range succession planning in place to ensure a smooth transition from one generation to the next. The first example is the chief executive succession planning. SW’s CEO, Herb Kelleher publicly commented that he chose James F. Parker as a new CEO, and Colleen C. Barrett as president and COO. Both Mr. Parker and Ms. Barrett are typical SW persons who have played important roles as top managements in the company for a long time. Mr. Kelleher has been carefully preparing Mr. Parker to assume the role of chief executive through making him participate in the important decision-making. Also, Ms. Barrett has played leading roles of embodying the company’s core ideology by weaving the culture across regional differences and indoctrinating new workers into SW’s ways. Mr. Parker and Ms. Barrett are surely expected to preserve the core ideology without leadership discontinuity. And SW is preparing for the next leadership in advance from appointing three executive vice presidents who are candidates to succeed Mr. Parker down the road. This is a good example of home-grown management mechanisms. Yes, as you said the CEO succession and preparing a CEO candidate pool are stark examples of a home-grown management mechanism.
Also this can be a good example of a home-grown management in that through training program for manager-level employees SWA is preparing candidates for future CEOs. But I want to point one thing here. You did not clearly show that SWA is linking those training programs to selecting future CEO pool.
[3] ‘이윤추구를 넘어서’(More than Profits) 메커니즘을 암시하는 예를 확인하고, 이를 간략하게 설명하십시오. The example to show that SW is relatively closer to ‘more than profit’ mechanism than its competitors is SW’s simple fare strategy. Unlike other airlines that rely heavily on computers and artificial intelligence programs to maximize flight revenue, SW typically offers only two fares on a route. SW doesn’t sell interline connection with other carriers and therefore only 55% percent of SW’s seats are booked by travel agents, compared with 90 percent of tickets for major airlines. Also, SW has its own frequent flyer club based on simple model. This strategy made SW a very profitable airline providing the great value to its customers. That means SW is very likely to do more than just make a profit. Actually SW’s simple fare strategy is closer to its core purpose than pursuing profit. Its core purpose is the dedication to the highest quality of customer service. Good. More than profits means a visionary company pursues core ideology than profits and paradoxically it earn more money by emphasizing core ideology. You have proved concisely that SWA’s fare strategy is based on its core purpose rather than profit orientation.
Assessment: E Trackback Address :: http://read-lead.com/blog/trackback/206
|
||




