'Core Ideology'에 해당되는 글 3건 |
||
[Built to Last] 비전기업의 탐색 :: 2007/04/20 00:013년 전 수강했던 Mini-MBA 과정 중 가장 인상 깊었던 PGEC (Principles of great enduring companies) 과정의 5주차 숙제...
다음으로 비전기업의 한 예로 여러분이 몸 담고 있는 기업이나 관심이 있는 기업(Find The BTL Evidence 학습자료에 소개된 18개 기업을 포함하여 국내 기업도 가능: 가능한 한 관련자료를 얻기 쉬운 기업) 중 한 개의 기업을 선정하여 웹사이트를 방문하십시오. 그리고 그 곳에서 어떻게 그 기업이 비전기업인지에 대한 증거를 찾아내어 아래의 질문 순서에 따라 600자(2-3페이지)분량으로 작성하십시오. 다음의 질문 순서에 따라 답하시오.
P&G is a training company. It has been conducting on-the-job, formal classroom, and web based training for a long time based on the belief that its success is derived from its people. It has been paying much attention to attracting and recruiting the finest people in the world. P&G provides the various learning program like personal leadership, people and communication, project management and e-learning programs. P&G’s extensive supports for training its people means that it can encourage individuals to develop their competency through high-quality education. P&G’s pursuing the learning organization surely seems to focus on long-term success, not short-term profit. P&G has been clearly concentrated on building a “learning” organization rather than on acquiring the individual personality traits of visionary leadership. That is the outstanding example of clock building. As the principle put it, organization is the ultimate invention of the clock-building leadership. [2] 그 기업이 지속적으로 핵심 가치와 핵심목표에 부합하고 있다는 증거 한 가지를 들어 주십시오.
Yes, P&G has a clearly defined core ideology and do every effort to stick to it.
In Yes, this anecdote shows clearly how P&G adhere to its core ideology.
4-1. Preserve the Core P&G has long-standing practices of carefully screening potential new hires, hiring young people for entry-level jobs, rigorously molding them into P&G ways of thought and behavior, spitting out the misfits, and making middle and top slots available only to loyal P&Gers who grew up inside the company. Indoctrination processes are both formal and informal. P&G inducts new employee into the company with training and orientation sessions and expects them to read its official biography “Eyes on Tomorrow”, which describes the company as “an integral part of the nation’s history” with “A spiritual inheritance” and “unchanging character”. New hires immediately find nearly all of their time occupied by working or socializing with other members of “the family”. P&G has a long historical track record of paternalistic and progressive employee pay and benefit programs, which bind its people closely to the company. (profit-sharing plan for workers, employee stock ownership plan, sickness-disability-retirement-life-insurance plan) P&G has used these programs not only as a means of rewarding employees, but also as mechanisms to influence behavior, gain commitment, and ensuring tightness of fit. That means P&G translates its core ideologies into tangible mechanisms aligned to send a consistent set of reinforcing signals. And it also indoctrinates people and impose tight of fit, and create a sense of belonging to something special. That is the exact example of “Cult-like Culture”, one mechanism among “Preserve the Core” principles. You’ve proved the existence of indoctrination process and tight of fit mechanism, showing that you understand cult-like culture which is pivotal in preserving the core.
P&G has the competing brand management structure that P&G brands compete directly with other P&G brands, almost if they were from different countries. P&G already had the best people, the best products, the best marketing muscle. So why not pit the best of P&G against the best of P&G? If the marketplace doesn’t provide enough competition, why not create a system of internal competition that makes it virtually impossible for any brand to rest on its laurels? That means P&G create internal competition in order to keep itself vibrant. P&G has a definite discomfort mechanism in place to combat the disease of complacency that inevitably begins to infect all successful organizations. This is the good example of “Good enough never is”, one mechanism among “Stimulate Progress”. Yes, brand manager system is a perfect example of GENI translated in the form of “clock”. Instructor feedback: Yours was a perfect one. Assessment: E Trackback Address :: http://read-lead.com/blog/trackback/209
|
||
[Built to Last] 사이프러스 반도체 분석 :: 2007/04/19 00:023년 전 수강했던 Mini-MBA 과정 중 가장 인상 깊었던 PGEC (Principles of great enduring companies) 과정의 4주차 숙제...
[1] 사이프러스사가 시계 만들기(Clock Building) 원칙에 부합하는지 아니면 상충하는지 예를 들어 분석하십시오. 적어도 두 가지 예를 들어 설명하십시오. CS(Cypress Semiconductor), in its early stage, focused on instituting a decentralized multidivisional structure based on its CEO, T.J. Rodgers’ wish that CS would be a big company with the speed, discipline, and energy of its early history. Rodgers proposed the idea of building a federation of small companies. The philosophy behind this approach was designed to create an energy level, sense of mission, and spirit of determination that Rodgers doubted could be achieved in a large company. That means CS aimed to be a self-contained market economy rather than a self-centered bureaucracy. Considering that its decentralization gave every division the authority and freedom to run it as if it were an independent business, this surely was the example CS practiced ‘clock building’ principle. Yes, CS had adopted the decentralized organization approach before. On the other hand, CS has the example of conflicting with ‘clock building’ principle. It changed its organizational structure in the face of negative growth in 1992. It has cut its product portfolio in half and removed incubator ventures and subsidiaries and sold some assets, laid off employees in the recognition that there was too much autonomy and not enough control. This change seemed to be focused on short-term profit rather than long-term success because it chose just the way to increase rapidly its operational efficiency without paying much attention to what would provide the long-term success. (Mechanism that could develop decentralized organization based on employees’ individual initiatives, for example, education program) Yes, as you put it, Rodgers have turned the direction of CS to a wrong destination.
Yes, at least seemingly, CS has developed its own core ideology based on internal consensus.
Great! Mckinsey should not restrict its domain to consulting. Based on its purpose to help its clients to be the best in their industry, Mckinsey can do something other than consulting in 100 years later. Like this CS may do something more than just producing semiconductors sometime. The example that shows CS adheres to cult-like culture mechanism is its tightness of fit. Rodgers believed that hiring the talented people is the very important factor for CS’s success. As an important part of the recruiting process, all hiring managers must submit a “hiring book” that documents the entire process. It can select the talented people with right attitude through the severe and elaborate evaluation for the interviewees. During the interview process, an explicit attempt is made to probe for cultural mismatches by using a career, and aspirations. The questionnaire forces the applicant to be specific about hard-to-quantify issues. After all, CS acquires only the competitive and talented people that can fit its core values. Its core values are focused on winning in competition, talented people, excellent quality. This means CS vigorously screen out those who don’t fit with the ideology and create an almost cult-like environment around the core ideology. Good. On the other hand, regrettably, CS shows the conflict with ‘home-grown management’ mechanism. It has focused only on attracting talented people from “raiding party”, not paid relatively little attention to training and developing its inner employees into managers, directors, chief executives. That means CS have been pursuing recruitment of talented people outside from the short-term perspective, have not made enough efforts to keep leadership continuity through developing current employees from long-term perspective. This enables big questions about CS like follows. “What will happen to CS when its great leader is gone?” This time you offered two different examples, one for example of adherence and another for example of in conflict. This is a very good approach because CS may not be Gold but clearly be Silver. 3-2. Stimulate Progress GR You mean CS? has a good mechanism to stimulate progress. Rodgers believed that growth masks waste, extravagance, and inefficiency. For this reason, CS demands ever-increasing productivity. To help achieve this, every quarter the company benchmarks itself on critical measures against its competitors. This exercise reinforces the shared mind-set about the importance of productivity growth. Unless there are significant improvements, the manager can’t request additional people. The logic underpinning this process is to run as lean as possible so that layoffs will not be required during a downturn. This means CS has discomfort mechanism in place to combat the disease of complacency that inevitably begins to infect all successful organizations. It is “Good enough never is” mechanism. I agree that Rodgers is a very demanding guy and he created some mechanisms to enforce discontent and endeavor to come up with it such as benchmarking. On the other hand, CS didn’t have its own BHAGs. CS has only focused on continuous improvement cost efficiency and productivity of operations, the implementation of programs for reducing cycle times and inventory. It didn’t have any BHAGs that was so clear, compelling and fell well outside the comfort zone. It just concentrated on increasing short-term revenue through people/performance management, killer software rather than continually set bold new goals for itself long into the future. This is the conflict with BHAGs mechanism. Yes. Just pursuing higher operational excellence cannot be a BHAGs. Instructor feedback: Good job. You have proved you have a thorough and balanced view on CS. Assessment : E. Trackback Address :: http://read-lead.com/blog/trackback/208
|
||
[Built to Last] AES 분석 :: 2007/04/16 00:013년 전 수강했던 Mini-MBA 과정 중 가장 인상 깊었던 PGEC (Principles of great enduring companies) 과정의 첫째주 숙제... AES사 사례를 읽고 AES사가 Built to Last(BTL) 원칙에 얼마나 충실히 따르고 있는지 분석하십시오. 단, 온라인의 학습자료 <AES 분석>에서 제시되고 있는 것과는 다른 예를 사용하여, 각각의 원칙에 대해 적어도 두 가지 이상의 새로운 예를 제시하십시오. 그리고 왜 그 예가 BTL원칙에 해당하는지 설명하십시오. [1] ‘시계만들기’(Clock Building)의 두 가지 예를 들고, 그 것이 왜 시계만들기 원칙에 해당하는지 설명하십시오. Core ideology is an organization’s self-identity that defines its enduring character. It remains consistent through time and transcends product/market life cycles, technological break-throughs, management fads, and individual leaders. It is composed of core purposes and core values. AES definitely has its own core ideology. Roger Sant and Dennis Bakke, founders of AES, discovered its authentic core ideology, that could be passionately-held on a gut level for a long time, based on their moral conviction. AES’s core purpose is “supplying electricity to customers worldwide in a socially responsible way”. It can be considered as well-defined one because it clearly provides deeper reasons for the organization’s existence beyond just making money. AES’s strong sense of responsibility that explicitly described in its core purpose made it possible for AES to grow into one of visionary companies beyond typical profit-pursuing companies. AES’s core values are integrity, fairness, social responsibility, and fun. They can be regarded as a good model of core values because they succeed in defining the enduring character of the organization independent of the current environment, competitive requirements, or management fads. Also AES’s core values deserve to become the organization’s essential and enduring tenets and have functioned as intrinsic guiding principles for people inside the organization. That means all the elements of the company have worked together in concert within the context of the company’s core ideology, in terms of alignment. One of those examples showing AES’s aligning itself with the core ideology can be seen in the company’s adding “shared value” as one of four measures used to assess the company’s performance and progress.
[2] ‘핵심이념’(Core Ideology)의 두 가지 예를 들고, 그 것이 왜 핵심이념 원칙에 해당하는지 설명하십시오. Clock building is a process of instituting concrete organizational mechanisms to stimulate change and improvement. This means seeing the ultimate creation as the company, not the execution of a specific idea or capitalizing on a timely market opportunity, and therefore moving toward becoming an enduring great institution regardless of what happens to its leader, who focuses his or her energies on building the organization. AES has concentrated primarily on building a decentralized organization. All functions are represented in every division and each division has responsibility for strategy and business development. This kind of decentralization gave every division the authority and freedom to run it as if it were an independent business. That makes its organization evolve and change on its own and AES people at all levels have enough room for individual initiatives. There is high possibility that AES will prosper long because AES people don’t depend on any charismatic leader for guidance in their work, but have the huge opportunity to grow and learn by failures and mistakes based on widespread diffusion of both knowledge and responsibility. That is the outstanding example of clock building. Another example of clock building is a tuition reimbursement program. It can encourage individuals to develop their competency through effective education by tiered tuition reimbursement structure. That’s the good mechanism that enables employees continue personal development voluntarily without any compulsive directions. Yours is a perfect answer except that you offered 2 examples of different levels. Adopting a decentralized organization and running a tuition reimbursement program are not same in their levels. The former is in policy level and the latter is in program level. You would have mentioned AES’s education policy to make even the 2 examples level. [3] ‘핵심을 보존하면서 동시에 발전을 촉진한다’(Preserve the Core and Stimulate Progress)는 원칙의 예를 들고, 그 것이 왜 ‘핵심을 보존하면서 동시에 발전을 촉진한다’는 원칙에 해당하는지 설명하십시오. [3-1] ‘핵심을 보존하기’의 두 가지 예를 들고, 이것이 왜 ‘핵심을 보존하기’에 해당하는지 설명하십시오. [3-2] ‘발전을 촉진하기’의 두 가지 예를 들고, 이것이 왜 ‘발전을 촉진하기’에 해당하는지 설명하십시오. Preserving the core means making specific efforts to ensure that its core remains intact without confusing core ideology with culture, strategy, tactics, operations, policies, or other non-core practices. AES didn’t just philosophize about its core ideology. It translated its core ideology into tangible practices. A good one of those examples is that AES plant strives to be a “good neighbor” to people living nearby. All the plants of AES are equipped with the highest cleanliness and immaculateness and provide neighbor-friendly impression. That means AES did it best to preserve the core purpose and core values with strong social responsibility. Another example also can be seen in cultural elements. The Stimulating progress means impelling change and forward movement in all that is not a part of the core through deep, inner, primal drive for progress that couldn’t be satisfied forever. And it should co-exist with preserving the core ideology within the organization like the yin and yang of Chinese dualistic philosophy. One of the example that AES has been stimulating progress is it’s corporate culture and organizing principle, “honeycomb” that is characterized by no formal job descriptions. This means AES guides its employees to do new things and proceed from new job scopes and new approaches for them. This effort is one of the most important factors that can give AES the huge opportunity to keep up continuous drive for progress. Another example is the company tends to use a lot of task forces and informal communication to make decisions. This means AES values employees’ freedom to make their own decisions and gave to many opportunity to grow in terms of competency and contribute to the company growth. This time you got it! Instructor Feedback: Mr. Choi, you have proven that you understand every concept clearly and apply it properly. I hope you can keep this pace till finish line. Assessment: Exemplary Trackback Address :: http://read-lead.com/blog/trackback/205
|
||




